The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • ACA Penalty Amounts for 2022 Tax Year Surface

Articles

ACA Penalty Amounts for 2022 Tax Year Surface

October 19, 2021 Joanna Kim-Brunetti Affordable Care Act
ACA Penalty Amounts for 2022 Tax Year Surface

ACA Penalty

The IRS recently announced the ACA affordability percentage for the 2022 tax year and with that information comes speculation around the Employer Mandate’s IRC Section 4980H(a) and (b) penalty amounts for the 2022 tax year.

Under the ACA’s Employer Mandate, employers with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, known as Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) must:

  • Offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time employees (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV); and 
  • Ensure that the coverage for the full-time employee is affordable based on one of the IRS-approved methods for calculating affordability.

Employers that fail to comply with these two requirements could be subject to IRC Section 4980H penalties via Letter 226J. 

While the IRS has not explicitly confirmed the penalty amounts yet, experts have made estimations. For the 2022 tax year, the annualized 4980H(a) penalty will be $2,750 per employee, or $229.17 a month. The annualized 4980H(b) penalty will be $4,120 per employee or $343.33 a month for the 2022 tax year. 

It’s important to remember that an employer will never receive both a 4980H(a) and 4980H(b) penalty for a specific reporting year. The IRS assesses these penalties in very different ways. The 4980H(A) penalty, also known as the hammer penalty, is issued to employers that fail to offer MEC to at least 95% of their full-time employees and their dependents. 

For all reporting years after 2015, if this penalty is triggered, the assessed 4980H(a) amount will deduct 30 full-time employees from the total number of full-time employees.

Here’s an example of the 4980H(a) ACA penalty for the 2022 tax year. Rocco Pizza Parlor has 100 full-time employees and doesn’t offer MEC coverage to the employees or their dependents. The penalty amount would be (100 – 30) x $2,750 = $192,500.

The 4980H(b) penalty is used on a per-employee basis and applies to the single employee that receives a Premium Tax Credit from a state or federal health exchange. So long as the employer does not offer coverage that is affordable and not Minimum Value, the 4980H(b) penalty will be assessed. 

Here’s an example of the 4980H(b) ACA penalty for the 2022 tax year. Johnny’s Saloon offers coverage that exceeds the ACA affordability threshold of 9.61% for a particular full-time employee. The employee declines coverage and opts to receive subsidized healthcare via a Premium Tax Credit (PTC) at the state health exchange. 

The IRS would then issue a Letter 226J penalty to Johnny’s Saloon for the employee that received the PTC in the amount of $4,120.

It’s important to remember that the aforementioned 4980H ACA penalty amounts are estimations and are not final, though they are unlikely to change. Like the 2022 draft ACA reporting forms, the 4980H penalties are subject to change and are used to help prepare for future ACA compliance and reporting. 

Recent IRS activity indicates that it is becoming more aggressive in the way it assesses ACA penalties. For example, employers must now prove why an ACA penalty shouldn’t be assessed by providing tangible evidence of math computations and affordability percentages.

The tax agency is currently issuing Letters 226J for the 2018 tax year and the precursor penalty notice, Letter 5699, for the 2019 tax year. 

For more information on ACA penalty Letter 226J and the specific 4980H(a) and (b) penalty explanations, head to the What is Letter 226J? page.

If you need assistance responding to an ACA penalty, contact us to learn about how we can help. So far we’ve prevented over $1 billion in ACA penalty assessments for our clients.

Need help with ACA reporting this year? Download the Employer’s Guide to Coding ACA Form 1095-C.

If your organization has received IRS Letter 226J, download our white paper on Letter 226J to learn best practices for responding to the penalty notice.

Summary
ACA Penalty Amounts for 2022 Tax Year Surface
Article Name
ACA Penalty Amounts for 2022 Tax Year Surface
Description
The IRS recently announced the ACA affordability percentage for the 2022 tax year and with that information comes speculation around the Employer Mandate’s IRC Section 4980H(a) and (b) penalty amounts for the 2022 tax year.
Author
JOANNA KIM-BRUNETTI
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/kzb
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Chief Legal Officer for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA 101 ToolkitACA ComplianceACA Employer MandateACA penaltyACA ReportingApplicable Larger Employers (ALEs)Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4980HIRS Letter 226JMinimum Essential Coverage (MEC)
Related Articles New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November
Related Articles Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results
Related Articles LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits
Related Articles Suit Denied Over Employer Mandate Delay by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Calculating FT and FTE Employees [UPDATED] Calculating FT and FTE Employees [UPDATED] by Joanna Kim-Brunetti  •  
Related Articles To Audit Or Not To Audit: How An ACA Audit Can Save Your Company’s Pockets To Audit Or Not To Audit: How An ACA Audit Can Save Your Company’s Pockets by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe
How to Respond to IRS Letter 226J

Popular Posts

  • IRS Proposed Ruling Could Change ACA Affordability
  • ACA Penalty Letter 226J on The Rise
  • New PTC Data is Cause For Concern For Employers
  • ACA Enrollment Reaches 35 Million Signups

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (167)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (87)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!