The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • After Settlement Rejected, Dave & Buster’s Court Case Continues

Articles

After Settlement Rejected, Dave & Buster’s Court Case Continues

February 21, 2018 Robert Sheen ACA Compliance, Lawsuits
After Settlement Rejected, Dave & Buster’s Court Case Continues

The class action lawsuit filed in federal courts in New York’s Southern District against entertainment and restaurant chain Dave & Buster’s is continuing after the judge in the case rejected a proposed $7.425 million settlement. The reason? According to the court order denying the motion to preliminarily approve of the settlement, the court stated that the proposed settlement was inconsistent with the complaint, which did not seek monetary compensation, and it failed to provide damages calculations or other evidence to sufficiently show that the settlement was fair and reasonable. The settlement, if approved, would have resolved the case and provided benefits to the 1,200 current and former full-time employees of Dave and Buster’s who are part of the class action lawsuit.

The class action lawsuit charges Dave & Buster’s with reducing employees’ hours to avoid the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) employer mandate, which requires employers with at least 50 full-time or full-time equivalent employees (called Applicable Large Employers or ALEs) to either offer minimum essential coverage to their full-time employees and their dependents and make the coverage “affordable” and provide “minimum value” to the full-time employees, or potentially make an employer shared responsibility payment (ESRP) to the IRS. Employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week are considered to be “full time” under the ACA.

The plaintiffs in the case, Marin v. Dave & Buster’s, Inc., claim that by having their hours cut by Dave & Buster’s, these employees lost their full-time work status, denying them the opportunity to get healthcare benefits. The plaintiffs claim that this is in direct violation of Section 510 of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), which prevents employers from intentionally taking actions that might abridge or impair an employee from collecting benefits. The plaintiffs alleged that management advised during at least two separate meetings that the ACA employer mandate would present an added cost to the company in excess of $2 million. That exposure now pales in comparison to the rejected settlement of $7.425 million.

Many organizations are now facing notices that contain ESRP’s in the millions of dollars, penalties assessed by the IRS for their failing to comply with the ACA. These IRS notices, Letter 226J, have been issued to organizations that the IRS asserts failed to comply with the ACA in their information filings to the IRS for the 2015 tax year. (To learn how to respond to Letter 226J, click here.)

While the case continues, it serves as a cautionary tale for other employers that are attempting to avoid the ACA’s employer mandate. All signs point to the ACA employer mandate remaining in place and that those organizations that try to circumvent it will be facing ESRPs that range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars. As the case continues to progress, it looks more and more that regardless of the outcome, it might have been cheaper for Dave & Buster’s to follow healthcare and benefit laws rather than try to circumvent them.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
After Settlement Rejected, Dave & Buster’s Court Case Continues
Article Name
After Settlement Rejected, Dave & Buster’s Court Case Continues
Description
A multi-million dollar settlement is rejected that would have ended the court case alleging that Dave & Buster’s reduced employee hours to avoid providing health insurance to employees offered by Dave & Buster’s to comply with ACA. Now the restaurant chain must prove that it did not violate federal laws.
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/glc
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Esq., is Editor-in-Chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersDave & BusterEmployer MandateEmployer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP)Health Care CoverageIRSLawsuitLetter 226JMarin v. Dave & Buster’sMinimum Essential CoverageMinimum ValuePenaltiesSection 510The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
Related Articles How to Leverage Your Workforce Data to Meet DEI Goals How to Leverage Your Workforce Data to Meet DEI Goals
Related Articles An Employer’s Guide to Navigating the DEI&A Landscape An Employer’s Guide to Navigating the DEI&A Landscape
Related Articles Governments, Investors, & Litigators Are Focusing More on ESG Governments, Investors, & Litigators Are Focusing More on ESG
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Feds Close “Skinny” Health Plan Loophole by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • California Individual Mandate Penalties Will be Issued in 2021
  • Biden’s Affordable Care Act Advancements are Underway
  • What Employers Need to Know About the 2020 ACA 1095-C Codes
  • Employers May Face Additional Challenges with 2020 ACA Reporting
  • Five Resources Essential for ACA Compliance in 2021
  • The IRS is Issuing ACA Penalty Letter 226J for 2018
  • Most Frequently Asked ACA Questions for Employers and Individuals
  • Taxpayers (Including Employers) Have the Right to the Challenge IRS

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!