The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • Employers Must Now Do More To Contest ACA Penalties From the IRS

Articles

Employers Must Now Do More To Contest ACA Penalties From the IRS

October 12, 2021 Robert Sheen ACA Compliance
Employers Must Now Do More To Contest ACA Penalties From the IRS

ACA Penalties IRS

It’s no surprise that the IRSis increasing its enforcement efforts of the ACA’s Employer Mandate, but the amended Letter 226J language indicates that the agency is taking it to the next level by asking employers to prove their offers of coverage are affordable.

The official penalty letter language now requires employers to substantiate that the coverage offered to a Premium Tax Credit (PTC) recipient is affordable. Specifically, the IRS language says, “Any month that shows XF, XG, or XH is due to a determination that you do not qualify for the safe harbor being claimed (2F, 2G, or 2H). If you still think the safe harbor applies, provide your computation with your written request for reconsideration.”

In other words, employers must prove why an affordability safe harbor applies to a particular ACA full-time employee. The new verbiage indicates that employers must provide tangible evidence using math computations, affordability percentages, and the applicable safe harbor as well to prove affordability.

This is a rather significant development in the way the IRS assesses ACA penalties and aligns with Treasurer Inspector General for Tax Administration’s (TIGTA) recommendation for the agency to do more to enforce the employer section of the healthcare law. 

The IRS is anticipating roughly $1 billion in additional funding for FY 2022 and it appears the agency is off and running with significant improvements to how it identifies ACA non-compliance.

Under the ACA’s Employer Mandate, employers with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, known as Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) must:

  • Offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time employees (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV); and 
  • Ensure that the coverage for the full-time employee is affordable based on one of the IRS-approved methods for calculating affordability.

Employers that fail to comply with these two requirements could be subject to IRC Section 4980H penalties via Letter 226J. The tax agency is currently issuing Letters 226J for the 2018 tax year and is expected to begin issuing them for the 2019 tax year any day.

If you receive a Letter 226J from the IRS, timing is of the essence, and the reporting year that the agency identifies also plays a role. First, carefully review the penalty notice, the summary table, the types of penalties being assessed, and the number of employees that received a Premium Tax Credit.

Next, provide the requested information to the IRS by the response date shown in the letter, which will be 30 days from the date the letter was issued. Respond in writing, either agreeing with the proposed Employee Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP) or disagreeing with part or all of the proposed penalty assessment. 

As the new penalty letter language indicates, the burden of proof has now grown for employers contesting ACA penalties. If you need assistance responding to the letter, calculating ACA affordability, making timely offers of coverage to ACA full-time employees, or anything else related to ACA compliance, contact us to learn about our full-service, comprehensive solution, ACA Complete.

To prevent penalties from happening in the first place, download the Employer’s Guide to Coding ACA Form 1095-C.

For information on ACA penalty amounts, affordability percentages, important filing deadlines, steps for responding to penalty notices, and best practices for minimizing IRS penalty risk, download the ACA 101 Toolkit.

Summary
Employers Must Now Do More To Contest ACA Penalties From the IRS
Article Name
Employers Must Now Do More To Contest ACA Penalties From the IRS
Description
It’s no surprise that the IRS is increasing its enforcement efforts of the ACA’s Employer Mandate
Author
ROBERT SHEEN
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/riu
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

ACA CompleteACA ComplianceACA penaltyForm 1095-CIRS Letter 226JTIGTATreasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)
Related Articles EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting
Related Articles Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality
Related Articles California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature
Related Articles IRS Releases Final Reporting Forms IRS Releases Final Reporting Forms by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Calculating FT and FTE Employees [UPDATED] Calculating FT and FTE Employees [UPDATED] by Joanna Kim-Brunetti  •  
Related Articles IRS Shares Success Of Premium Tax Credit Calculations For 2015 IRS Shares Success Of Premium Tax Credit Calculations For 2015 by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • What Employers Need to Know About the California Individual Mandate
  • What you Need to Know About IRS Letter 5699
  • Handling Seasonal Employees and Workers is Critical for ACA Compliance
  • The 2022 ACA 101 Toolkit is Here
  • These Industries are Most at Risk for ACA Penalties From the IRS

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (169)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (19)
  • IRS
    (86)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!