The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Exchange Notices Can Lead to IRS Letter 226J ACA Penalties

Articles

Exchange Notices Can Lead to IRS Letter 226J ACA Penalties

September 5, 2018 Joanna Kim-Brunetti Affordable Care Act, IRS 226J/226-J
Exchange Notices Can Lead to IRS Letter 226J ACA Penalties

3 minute read:

It’s no secret the IRS has been actively enforcing the Affordable Care Act’s Employer Mandate. To date, the IRS has identified a total of 49,259 employers that did not comply with the ACA for the 2015 tax year alone. So far, that’s more than 30,000 Letter 226J tax notices that have been issued with penalty assessments for more than $4.4 billion.

The IRS has started issuing Letter 5699 notices to organizations that the IRS believes were Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) that failed to file information returns for the 2016 reporting year. ALEs are employers with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees and are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce and their dependents whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is affordable for the employee or be subject to IRS 4980H penalties. The IRS requires ALEs to file information returns with the agency and provide statements to their full-time employees relating to whether they were offered health insurance and coverage to the employees (and their dependents), and if so, certain details about that health insurance coverage.

Once the IRS has gone through this Letter 5699 exercise, we can expect the agency to start issuing Letter 226J penalty notices to those employers that are determined to be non-compliant with the ACA for the 2016 reporting year.

The issuance of a Premium Tax Credit (PTC) to an employee triggers the issuance of a Letter 226J penalty notice. The best way to potentially avoid an IRS Letter 226J is to successfully appeal the Exchange Notice.

An Exchange Notice is issued to employers by state and federal health exchanges notifying them that at least one full-time or full-time equivalent employee applied for health coverage through a state or federal health exchange and was deemed eligible to receive a Premium Tax Credit (PTC). The employee was deemed eligible for the PTC because he or she claimed that he or she did not receive an offer of Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) from his/her employer or did not receive an offer of coverage that was affordable and met Minimum Value (MV).

Upon receipt of an Exchange Notice, employers have two options:

  1. Attempt to appeal the notice.
  2. Ignore it and wait until your organization receives IRS Letter 226J.

In order to successfully appeal the Exchange Notice, an organization must have documentation readily on hand. The offer of coverage and the details of that coverage are key for successfully appealing the notice. Organizations, must also be able to explain their methodology for tracking hours to determine full-time status. Proper understanding of the tracking of employees to apply one of the IRS’ approved measurement methods is critical.

Failure to successfully appeal the notice will likely result in receiving IRS Letter 226J, the IRS’s penalty notice for ACA non-compliance. As a reminder, there are two penalties that can be assessed in IRS Letter 226J. Below is a breakdown of how the penalty assessments are determined:

The A Penalty
This penalty will be triggered if the employer failed to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce and their dependents.

Here is an example for a 2018 penalty calculation:

$2,320/12 per month x the total number of full-time employees – 30 employee exemptions

The B Penalty
This penalty is triggered for each full-time employee who receives a Premium Tax Credit (PTC) when purchasing health insurance from a government exchange like HR.gov because he or she indicated to the exchange that the coverage offered by the employer was unaffordable and/or did not meet Minimum Value (MV).

Here is an example for a 2018 penalty calculation:

$3,480/12 per PTC month x total number of employees that received a PTC

Some organizations have reported penalty assessments in the millions of dollars. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that $12 billion in ACA penalties will be assessed by the IRS in 2018.

You can learn more about avoiding IRS penalties by downloading our ACA 101 Toolkit.

If your organization is to successfully appeal an Exchange Notice, consider outsourcing a third-party expert. Many companies that specialize in ACA compliance will implement the correct measurement method, explain coverage periods, track documentation, validate your data sources and provide unlimited expertise.

As the IRS continues to issue penalty notices, can your organization successfully handle an Exchange Notice?

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2018, click here.

For ACA reporting in 2019, organizations should review this link for important dates and requirements.


For any questions or a consultation on the ACA or IRS Letter 226J, contact Gregg Kasubuchi of Trusaic at (213) 355-5108 or at gkasubuchi@trusaic.com.

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Summary
Exchange Notices Can Lead to IRS Letter 226J ACA Penalties
Article Name
Exchange Notices Can Lead to IRS Letter 226J ACA Penalties
Description
A strong ACA compliance process can lead to successful appeals of Exchange Notices and prevent receipt of IRS Letter 226J and financial penalties.
Author
JOANNA KIM-BRUNETTI
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/jqu
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA Penalty Prevention GuideACA ReportingAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersCongressional Budget OfficeEmployer MandateExchange NoticeHealth Care CoverageIRSIRS 4980H PenaltiesLetter 226JLetter 5699Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)PenaltiesPremium Tax Credit (PTC)
Related Articles Why Your Company Needs to Implement Pay Equity Audits Now Why Your Company Needs to Implement Pay Equity Audits Now
Related Articles Survey Finds Organizations Should Be Conducting Pay Equity Analyses Survey Finds Organizations Should Be Conducting Pay Equity Analyses
Related Articles Seattle Washington Implements Gig Economy Worker Protections Seattle Washington Implements Gig Economy Worker Protections
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  

Popular Posts

  • IRS Issues Draft 2019 ACA Forms 1094-C and 1095-C and Reporting Instructions
  • The Look-Back Measurement Method Can Help Prevent ACA Penalties
  • IRS Issues Deadline Extension for Furnishing Forms 1095-C
  • ACA Affordability to Decrease for the 2020 Tax Year
  • What to Expect from California’s Individual Mandate
  • Letter 972CG Late Penalty Assessments are Becoming More Difficult to Repeal
  • ACA Filing Takeaways for The New Year
  • Changing the Poverty Level Could Impact the ACA

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (110)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (80)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories

Click me

Follow Us

Twitter Facebook

© 2019 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!