The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • ACA Reporting
  • Expect the IRS to Start Issuing ACA Penalties for 2016 Tax Year in November

Articles

Expect the IRS to Start Issuing ACA Penalties for 2016 Tax Year in November

September 26, 2018 Robert Sheen ACA Reporting, Affordable Care Act, IRS
Expect the IRS to Start Issuing ACA Penalties for 2016 Tax Year in November

3 minute read: 

As November approaches, two things seem certain. There will be national midterm elections and the IRS will begin issuing Letter 226J penalty notices to employers identified as having not complied with the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Employer Mandate for the 2016 tax year. We know that midterm elections are confirmed (they are being held on Tuesday, November 6), as we were reminded with the celebration of National Voter Registration Day yesterday.

The timeline for issuance of a new round of Letter 226J penalty notices, this time for the 2016 tax year, is not as nailed down. If it is, the IRS has not provided any public announcements of when that notice will start to be issued. However, there have been clues that it’s soon.

The issuance of Letter 5699 is the latest significant indicator that the IRS is gearing up to issue penalty notices for the 2016 reporting year. The IRS has begun issuing Letter 5699, which essentially states that the IRS believes that a particular employer was an ALE but failed to file information returns for the 2016 reporting year. The letter asks the employer to confirm the name the ALE used when filing its ACA information, provide the Employer Identification Number (EIN) submitted, and the date the filing was made with the IRS.

An earlier indicator was found in the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report from March this year. TIGTA reported that the IRS now has the data to begin the analysis to calculate the potential ESRPs for tax year 2016 to be issued to those ALEs determined to be non-compliant. TIGTA reports that the IRS has spent over $2.8 million to improve the process for identifying, calculating, and processing non-compliant ALEs.

The information is all there in support of 2016 reporting year penalty notices being issued in November. And just because the 2016 notices are coming, doesn’t mean we’ve seen the last of the 2015 notices. The IRS will have until mid-2019 to continue issuing 2015 Letter 226J penalty notices based on the statute of limitations.

The better question to ask is why wouldn’t the IRS begin issuing Letter 226J penalty notices for the 2016 reporting year before the end of year? No signs from the White House or Congress has indicated a likely repeal of the ACA’s Employer Mandate or the ACA in its entirety. Maybe waiting until after the midterms might make sense so the latest round of ACA penalties for employers don’t turn voters against incumbents. However, the ACA and how it impacts employers has not been much of an election issue. All the focus has been on the ACA’s protection of pre-existing conditions.

The September 2018 Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that a majority of the American public say it is “very important” that the ACA’s protections for people with pre-existing conditions ensuring guaranteed coverage (75 percent) remain law. About 81% of Americans polled in the survey said that health care was either their most important or was a very important issue in the upcoming midterm elections.

Under the ACA’s Employer Mandate, ALEs, organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is affordable for the employee or be subject to IRS 4980H penalties.

ALEs with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees that have not filed their 2015, 2016 or 2017 tax year ACA information with the IRS should file as soon as possible using IRS Schedules 1094-C and 1095-C to minimize potential IRS penalties.

ALEs should anticipate continued issuance of the IRS Letter 226J and revisit their historic ACA information filings for accuracy. Conducting an ACA Penalty Risk Assessment could provide ALEs with some idea of whether they may be in line to receive penalty assessments from the IRS.

We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
Expect the IRS to Start Issuing ACA Penalties for 2016 Tax Year in November
Article Name
Expect the IRS to Start Issuing ACA Penalties for 2016 Tax Year in November
Description
The first IRS Letter 226J penalty notices were issued in November last year to address ACA non-compliance for the 2015 tax year.
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/cvm
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen, Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic, Inc. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA Penalty Risk AssessmentACA ReportingAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersCongressEmployer Identification Number (EIN)Employer MandateHealth Care CoverageIRSIRS 4980H PenaltiesIRS Letter 226JIRS Schedule 1094-CIRS Schedule 1095-CKaiser Health Tracking PollLetter 5669Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)National Midterm ElectionsNational Voter Registration DayPenaltiesTreasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)White House
Related Articles EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting
Related Articles Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality
Related Articles California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • What Employers Need to Know About the California Individual Mandate
  • What you Need to Know About IRS Letter 5699
  • Handling Seasonal Employees and Workers is Critical for ACA Compliance
  • The 2022 ACA 101 Toolkit is Here
  • These Industries are Most at Risk for ACA Penalties From the IRS

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (169)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (19)
  • IRS
    (86)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!