The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Government Employers Are Not Exempt from the ACA

Articles

Government Employers Are Not Exempt from the ACA

September 17, 2019 Joanna Kim-Brunetti Affordable Care Act, IRS
Government Employers Are Not Exempt from the ACA

3 minute read: 

No organization is immune to the responsibilities of the Affordable Care Act, as a Texas County recently discovered.

Galveston County, Texas, received an IRS Letter 972CG penalty notice for $76,550 for failing to meet the filing deadline for submitting ACA information for the 2018 tax year as required by the ACA’s Employer Mandate. The penalty was issued under IRC Section 6721 for filing forms 1094-C and 1095-C after the deadline to file electronically.

According to a post by the Houston Chronicle, “County information technology officials explained that the error stemmed from an issue with a vendor that facilitates electronic submission.”

This is a somewhat common occurrence. Over the past few years, many employers relied on do-it-yourself software and payroll companies to submit ACA information to the IRS on their behalf. In some cases, the software and payroll companies submitted the information electronically to the IRS and, not checking on submission status, didn’t realize the submissions were rejected. Now, many employers are realizing that the IRS never received their submissions and, as a result, are being issued ACA late filing penalty notices. Expect IRS staff to insist that employers obtain submission acceptance notices to prove they filed with the IRS as part of their defense to have ACA penalty assessments dismissed.

In this case, the County’s vendor allegedly submitted the forms electronically but had them “Rejected.” Filing the forms a second time four days later, the IRS issued an “Accepted with Errors” status regarding the filing. The errors in the filing submission could also have factored into the penalty assessment.

Receiving the status of “Accepted with Errors” is a common status to receive for Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) (organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees) who are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC)  to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to IRC Section 4980H penalties.

It’s important to note that ACA penalties can be assessed on employers for a number of reasons and employers should take the filing process seriously. Below is a breakdown of the two filing statuses Galveston County received from the IRS:

The status of “Rejected” occurs when the submission was not sent in the correct format, there was an error in the 1094-C transmittal, such as a wrong EIN, or a combination of the two. If you receive a status of “Rejected,” the entire submission needs to be replaced.

“Accepted with Errors” means the IRS has identified a mismatch in all or a handful of 1095-C forms submitted. The most common errors involve Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs). TIN errors can occur for a number of reasons, but usually can be resolved rather quickly. Learn more about TIN errors and correcting them by clicking here.

A full list of the transmission responses following ACA electronic submissions to the IRS can be found by clicking here.

In Galveston County’s case, the status of “Rejected” and “Accepted with Errors” had a part to play in their reception of Letter 972CG. It led to the organization filing at a much later time, and when the submission was accepted it contained errors.

Organizations need to be sure they not only meet the requirements of the ACA’s Employer Mandate, but also make sure they meet the deadline for accurately filing and furnishing their ACA forms 1904-C and 1095-C under IRC 6721 and 6722. If you’re going to use an outside vendor for satisfying this requirement, make sure it’s one that you can trust.

Currently the IRS is issuing Letter 226J penalty notices for the 2017 tax year to employers identified as having failed to comply with the ACA’s Employer Mandate.

The case of Galveston County Texas shows us the IRS is adamant about enforcing all aspects of the ACA’s Employer Mandate for all employers, including the government.

To learn more about ACA compliance for the 2019 tax year, click here.

For ACA reporting deadlines in 2020 for the 2019 tax year, organizations should review this link for important dates and requirements.


For any questions or a consultation on the ACA or IRS Letter 226J, contact Gregg Kasubuchi of Trusaic at (213) 355-5108 or at gkasubuchi@trusaic.com.

Share this...
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Summary
Government Employers Are Not Exempt from the ACA
Article Name
Government Employers Are Not Exempt from the ACA
Description
A Texas County demonstrates that no employer is immune to the responsibilities of the ACA’s Employer Mandate.
Author
Joanna Kim-Brunetti
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/pfo
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti
Related Articles Why Your Company Needs to Implement Pay Equity Audits Now Why Your Company Needs to Implement Pay Equity Audits Now
Related Articles Survey Finds Organizations Should Be Conducting Pay Equity Analyses Survey Finds Organizations Should Be Conducting Pay Equity Analyses
Related Articles Seattle Washington Implements Gig Economy Worker Protections Seattle Washington Implements Gig Economy Worker Protections

Popular Posts

  • IRS Issues Draft 2019 ACA Forms 1094-C and 1095-C and Reporting Instructions
  • The Look-Back Measurement Method Can Help Prevent ACA Penalties
  • IRS Issues Deadline Extension for Furnishing Forms 1095-C
  • ACA Affordability to Decrease for the 2020 Tax Year
  • What to Expect from California’s Individual Mandate
  • Letter 972CG Late Penalty Assessments are Becoming More Difficult to Repeal
  • ACA Filing Takeaways for The New Year
  • Changing the Poverty Level Could Impact the ACA

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (110)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (80)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories

Click me

Follow Us

Twitter Facebook

© 2019 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!