The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Supreme Court to Rule on ACA Constitutionality

Articles

Supreme Court to Rule on ACA Constitutionality

March 16, 2020 Robert Sheen Affordable Care Act
Supreme Court to Rule on ACA Constitutionality

2 minute read:

The Supreme Court has agreed to rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, for a second time.

This unusual turn of events comes after the Fifth Circuit handed down a ruling regarding the constitutionality late last year affirming a prior trial court decision finding the individual mandate, with the tax penalty zeroed out, to be unconstitutional but remanding the case for further factual analysis on whether the unconstitutional portion of the law could be severed from the remainder of the ACA.

The Fifth Circuit decision arises from a suit brought by a number of Republican states and several individuals in the Federal District Court in Fort Worth Texas. They argued that the Individual Mandate, with the tax penalty zeroed out by Congress, was unconstitutional and that the entire ACA needed to be struck down as a result. The District Court in Fort Worth agreed and struck down the whole ACA in December of 2018. That decision stayed pending appeal.

Usually the Supreme Court would wait for the trial court process to play out and an updated decision regarding the severability question. Instead, at the urging of the Attorney Generals from several democratic states, who have been defending the law, the Court has added the case to its fall 2020 oral argument calendar.

The Supreme Court will rule on two separate questions. First, whether the federal Individual Mandate, with the penalty set to $0, is constitutional and second, if the mandate is unconstitutional, to what extent can it be severed from the remainder of the ACA.

After oral arguments this fall, a decision is expected by mid-2021.

At this time, it is likely that the ACA will survive, even if it lives on without the federal Individual Mandate. With individual states passing their own Individual Mandate legislation, it brings home the reality that the law is becoming more ingrained into the U.S. health care ecosystem.

Already, states such as California, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island and the District of Columbia have passed their own state-wide individual mandate. More are likely to follow.

Employers, this means that complying with the ACA’s Employer Mandate is still a major requirement to be met.

As a reminder to employers in conjunction with the Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP), the ACA’s Employer Mandate, Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) (organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees) are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4980H penalties.

With the ACA remaining intact, the IRS will continue to increase their enforcement activities around compliance with the law, as we have already seen.

The tax agency is currently issuing Letter 226J penalty notices for the 2017 tax year and is expected to begin issuing penalties for the 2018 tax year shortly. Organizations should elect to undergo an ACA Penalty Risk Assessment to learn their penalty exposure and implement course-correction to avoid any future exposure.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2020, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
Supreme Court to Rule on ACA Constitutionality
Article Name
Supreme Court to Rule on ACA Constitutionality
Description
The Supreme Court will rule on the ACA based on oral arguments this fall, despite further fact finding not having been performed by lower courts.
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/ehc
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen, Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic, Inc. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA Employer MandateACA Penalty Risk AssessmentACA ReportingAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersDistrict Court in Fort WorthFifth CircuitHealth Care CoverageIndividual MandateIRC Section 4980H PenaltiesIRSIRS Letter 226JMinimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)Supreme Court
Related Articles Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland
Related Articles DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31 DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31
Related Articles Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to ACA by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe
Clean data owns future

Achieve Pay Equity

Popular Posts

  • New Individual Mandate Regulations: What You Need to Know
  • Employers, Mark These Key 2021 Dates for 2020 ACA Reporting
  • ACA Improvements to Expect from the Biden Administration
  • Minimize Penalties with ACA Best Practices for the Holiday Season
  • The ACA is Central to American Health and Wellbeing
  • Democrats Gain Senate, Paving the Way for Biden’s ACA Agenda
  • PPP Loans Are Now Available, Both First Draw and Second Draw PPP Loans

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!