The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Two Errors That Are Triggering ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Payments from the IRS

Articles

Two Errors That Are Triggering ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Payments from the IRS

January 24, 2018 Robert Sheen Affordable Care Act, IRS 226J/226-J
Two Errors That Are Triggering ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Payments from the IRS

Some trends are emerging on what is triggering the IRS to issue Letter 226J notices to organizations.

Since November, the IRS has been sending notices to organizations that failed to comply with ACA’s Employer Mandate (Internal Revenue Code Section 4980H) based on information identified in the annual filing submitted to the IRS for the 2015 tax year. This letter proposes Section 4980H penalties called Employer Shared Responsibility Payments, or ESRPs. It provides the general procedures the IRS used to propose the penalties, and the procedures for the recipient to respond. Private companies, public companies, as well as government entities, are receiving such an ESRP penalty notices. Some organizations are seeing such penalty notices in the millions of dollars.

Among the errors that trigger these Section 4980H penalties, here are two of the most common errors:

Failing to check the Section 4980H Transition Relief Indicator Box.

Your organization could check this box if it is between 50-99 full-time/full-time equivalent employees and meets certain maintenance requirements on workforce size and existing healthcare coverage. If your organization meets these – typically easily shown – requirements, your organization would not be subject to any Section 4980H penalties.

If your organization has 100 or more full time/full time equivalent employees, it could still check this box to apply a 70% instead of 95% threshold for offer compliance, i.e., the percent of full-time employees to whom your organization made an offer of coverage in 2015. If you or your vendor failed to check this box while meeting the 70% threshold, but not the 95% threshold, it will trigger Section 4980H(a) penalties.

Plainly, some vendors who did the 2015 reporting did not understand either of these two forms of transition relief or left it to the client to figure it out and the client did not understand how to invoke the transition relief. The fix for this issue is easy. Inform the IRS that the penalty was incurred because you forgot to check the applicable box. You will need to complete the ESRP Response (Form 14764) along with your signed statement supporting it. (To the extent your organization is seeking the 50-99 full time/full time equivalent transition relief, your organization will want to specify that it met the eligibility requirements in the ESRP Response along with your supporting signed statement.)

Failure to apply the Look-Back Measurement Method properly.

The IRS allows organizations to use two methods to determine if a worker is “full time” under the ACA for reporting purposes: the Monthly Measurement Method and the Look-Back Measurement Method.

Under the Monthly Measurement Method, the employer determines if an employee is a full-time employee on a month-by-month basis by looking at whether the employee has at least 130 hours of service for each month.

Under the Look-Back Measurement Method, an employer may determine the status of an employee as a full-time employee during what is referred to as the stability period, based upon the hours of service of the employee in the preceding period, which is referred to as the measurement period. The Look-Back Measurement Method can be particularly useful for variable-hour, part-time and seasonal employees who are not reasonably expected to average at least 30 hours of service per week, i.e., the definition of “full-time” under the ACA. It also allows for longer “limited non-assessment periods,” which are periods in which the employer need not offer coverage.

The Look-Back Measurement Method requires close monitoring and tracking, and clean, reliable data. Application of this method requires substantial regular attention as information is tracked monthly, as well as a deep understanding of the rules surrounding the Look-Back Measurement Method.

Failure to apply this method properly has resulted in organizations overcounting the number of full-time employees, and thereby overcounting the number of employees to whom the employer must make an offer of coverage. This is the number of employees for whom your organization must show that it made 95% offers of coverage (or 70% threshold for 2015 if you checked the box for Section 4980H Transition Relief).

To challenge the IRS proposed ESRP in order to eliminate or reduce it, your organization will need to review the documentation supporting the 1095-C Schedules to figure out if the reporting was done incorrectly. The biggest challenge is created by the failure to maintain supporting documentation in a centralized location that is easy to access. Unlike the standard ACA reporting process, which potentially gives a client more than a year to gather the supporting documents for the reporting year, once Letter 226J arrives, you typically have 30 days to respond. Even with an extension, you may only get another 30 to 45 days to respond. Letter 226J for the 2015 tax year reporting has been issued two or more years after the end of 2015. This can make the task of gathering supporting documents more challenging if they are not in a centralized location and easily accessible.

How to Prepare

The IRS continues to issue Letter 226Js for the 2015 tax year filings, and will likely begin issuing similar notices for the 2016 tax year sometime this year.

Now is the time to make sure that your organization’s employee information and supporting documentation for the 2015 and 2016 years are organized and easily accessible. And make sure that the needed information and documentation is ready to prepare your annual ACA filing to the IRS for the 2017 tax year. It’s also a good time to review your past ACA compliance process to see how it may be improved to avoid potential errors. Consider consulting a third-party with ACA expertise to assist you in reviewing your compliance process. Many vendors will do an initial review at no cost.

Organizations need to remember that the IRS ACA penalty process is new. While there is a possibility that the IRS may accept your unsubstantiated response as to why your penalty should be reduced or eliminated, the IRS will expect that you have the supporting calculations and documentation underlying the response that the IRS may audit at a future date. Providing incorrect information to the IRS can have severe penalties. You want to have your documentation in hand and easily accessible before responding to the IRS to contest your penalty assessments.

With half the businesses in the U.S. saying they are not confident in their ability to satisfy ACA requirements, and reported ESRPs in the millions of dollars being assessed by the IRS against organizations receiving Letter 226J, the stakes are high. Now is the time to get prepared.

To download an infographic on how to respond to Letter 226J, click here.

For more resources to help you address ACA compliance, visit our free ACA Resource Center by clicking here.

We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
Two Errors That Are Triggering ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Payments from the IRS
Article Name
Two Errors That Are Triggering ACA Employer Shared Responsibility Payments from the IRS
Description
Two errors are emerging as the primary cause for organizations to receive a Letter 226J notice from the IRS. Learn what they are and how to address them.
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/bnm
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Esq., is Editor-in-Chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

1095-C SchedulesACA ComplianceACA ReportingACA Resource CenterAffordable Care ActEmployer MandateEmployer Shared Responsibility Payments (ESRP)ESRP Response (Form 14764)Health Care CoverageIRSIRS Section 4980HLetter 226JLook-Back Measurement MethodMonthly Measurement MethodPenaltiesTransition Relief
Related Articles New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November
Related Articles Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results
Related Articles LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • IRS Proposed Ruling Could Change ACA Affordability
  • ACA Penalty Letter 226J on The Rise
  • Submit ACA Corrections Now to Avoid IRS Penalties
  • New PTC Data is Cause For Concern For Employers
  • ACA Enrollment Reaches 35 Million Signups

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (167)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (87)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!