The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • The Verdict On UK’s Uber Employee Classification Case Is “Groundbreaking”

Articles

The Verdict On UK’s Uber Employee Classification Case Is “Groundbreaking”

November 23, 2016 Robert Sheen Affordable Care Act, Regulations
The Verdict On UK’s Uber Employee Classification Case Is “Groundbreaking”

Uber has proven to be both a gift and a curse over the years. While the mobile car service app appears to have cornered a market previously held by more traditional companies, it has allowed efficiency and accessibility to everyday commuters while also opening an untapped job market. Those benefits have not been without a fair share of burdens, especially since the Affordable Care Act came fully into effect.

In the United States, several states, including California, have seen Uber disputes over employee classifications, given the stretches of time where drivers spent over 30 hours working within a week, the result of which may mean that they are entitled to health care benefits under the ACA.

It doesn’t stop there, as other benefits like rest, holidays, and occupational expenses have raised questions about drivers’ rights, which have been raised in lawsuits. The U.S. is arguably still figuring it all out on a case-by-case basis. The UK, however, has come to a firm decision on the matter and it will change the gig economy as we know it, at least in the UK.

The BBC reports that the Uber case in the UK has resulted in drivers being deemed as employees of Uber and not self-employed. What does that mean? Health care, holidays, minimum wage (nationally), and other benefits will now be offered to drivers. This applies to over 400,000 drivers employed by Uber across England and Wales alone.

While Uber is based in San Francisco, the company argued that even in the UK, drivers are self-employed and has every intent to appeal this decision. However, the courts ruled that Uber has voluntarily “twisted” words around in documents, as if to rewrite rules to work their favor.

An attorney for the two drivers in the lawsuit, Nigel Mackay of the Leigh Day law firm, described the ruling as groundbreaking. “It will impact not just on the thousands of Uber drivers working in this country, but on all workers in the so-called gig economy whose employers wrongly classify them as self-employed and deny them the rights to which they are entitled,” Mackay expressed.

While the blanket decision was based around two instances, some “Uber drivers are pleased, while others concerned. Drivers whose expenses have led to a net income below minimum wage are happy to see progress, while some question how Uber’s business practices will come into play, especially after being “self-employed” for so long. The success of this decision will take a while to fully play out, but it certainly is a situation that should show on the radar of the United States, as the country is still divided over employee classifications across state lines.

To view the BBC article, click here.

We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/phb
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen, Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic, Inc. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

Affordable Care ActBBCHealth Care CoverageRegulationsUberUKUnited States
Related Articles EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting EEOC Gears up for the Return of EEO-1 Component 2 Pay Data Reporting
Related Articles Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality
Related Articles California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • What Employers Need to Know About the California Individual Mandate
  • What you Need to Know About IRS Letter 5699
  • Handling Seasonal Employees and Workers is Critical for ACA Compliance
  • The 2022 ACA 101 Toolkit is Here
  • These Industries are Most at Risk for ACA Penalties From the IRS

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (169)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (19)
  • IRS
    (86)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!