The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • These Errors Greatly Determine Your Penalty Assessment in IRS Letter 226J

Articles

These Errors Greatly Determine Your Penalty Assessment in IRS Letter 226J

June 25, 2018 Joanna Kim-Brunetti ACA Compliance, ACA Reporting, IRS 226J/226-J
These Errors Greatly Determine Your Penalty Assessment in IRS Letter 226J

3 minute read:

The issuance of Letter 226J for IRS information filings submitted for the 2015 tax year has caught many organizations off guard. More than 30,000 notices have been issued to date representing $4.4 billion in penalty assessments.

During late 2017, starting with the 2015 reporting year, the IRS began issuing Letter 226J, which contained 4980H penalty assessments to applicable large employers (ALEs) who the tax agency determined had not complied with the Affordable Care Act. Employers were considered to be ALEs for 2015 if they had 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees. As ALEs, these employers were required under the ACA to offer minimum essential coverage to at least 70% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) that met minimum value and was affordable for their employees during the 2015 reporting year.

The percentage of full-time employees (and their dependents) that must receive offers of minimum essential coverage increases to 95% in subsequent years.

Having reviewed numerous Letter 226J notices, we’ve noticed that there are four common errors in 2015 reporting of ACA information to the IRS that have consistently increased the penalty assessments to ALEs:

4980H Transition Relief Box:
On Line 22, section C on the 1094-C, there was a box to be marked to indicate Section 4980H Transition Relief. For 2015, there were two reasons that could allow employers to check this box.

  1. ALEs with 50-99 full-time and full-time equivalent employee were not subject to any 4980H penalties for any calendar month of 2015.
  2. ALEs with 100 or more full-time and full-time equivalent employees could take advantage of an increased number of the allocated reduction of full-time employees of 80.

After checking the box that your organization qualified for 4980H Transition Relief, employers needed to indicate which type of transition relief for which they qualified. This had to be indicated in Part III, lines 23-35 of the 1094-C. Code “A” had to be entered if you qualified for 50-99 transition relief and code “B” if your organization had 100 or more full-time and full-time equivalent employees for the applicable months. If employers did not do this correctly, they received a penalty assessment.

Full-Time Status Overstated:
This error was probably the most significant because it directly related to the penalty amount proposed in Letter 226J. Understanding the ACA is no easy undertaking. The most critical component of doing so is being able to correctly identify your full-time workforce. Penalties are based on the stated full-time counts for each month of the reporting year provided on Form 1094-C. If these numbers were stated incorrectly, the proposed penalty amount could be significant.

Code Errors:
Similar to your full-time counts, the codes on the 1095-C schedule ultimately determined if and for what month(s) your organization may be subject to 4980H penalties. Line 14 identifies what, if any, kind of offer of coverage was being made to employees and which employees received the offer. Line 15 identified the lowest cost contribution for self-only coverage IF the plan did not meet the Federal Poverty Level safe harbor. Line 16 indicated why a penalty could not be assessed for a particular month because a safe harbor applied. If you identified the wrong code combinations, you could have ended up with a significant penalty assessment.

Minimum Essential Coverage Offer Box:
If your organization offered minimum essential coverage for all 12 months, employers should have checked the “All 12 Months” box on the 1094-C transmittal. This was critical. Failing to do so immediately indicated to the IRS that for particular months you did not offer coverage that met the requirements of the ACA. Again, this resulted in significant penalty assessments.

It’s safe to say that filling out your ACA information filings annually is a crucial process that can impact whether to what extent you receive significant penalty assessments from the IRS. In the event one or more of your full-time employees go to a government health exchange and receive a premium tax credit – and your organizations fails to populate using the correct codes, indicate the right markers, and enter the right company information – you could be looking at a very big penalty assessment.

The challenge is that the mistakes that may have contributed to the size of penalty assessments for failing to comply with the ACA in 2015 will be different for 2016 and 2017 because filing requirements will be somewhat different. For example, ALEs will need to indicate that they offered to 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents), not 70%, in filings made after 2015. Also, there is no longer 4980H transition relief for ALEs with 50-99 full-time and full-time equivalent employees. Stayed tuned for more information on the rules and guidelines for filings following 2015.

If 2015 tells employers anything at all about the ACA compliance pitfalls that may increase penalty assessments in subsequent years, it is to make sure employers learn from past mistakes. If you’re unsure of the quality of your previous ACA information returns, consider contacting a third-party ACA expert to help you undertake a spot audit of your past ACA information returns. Many times these will be performed at no cost.

Take the initiative to identify potential issues in your ACA information returns for 2015-2017 before your organization receives a Letter 226J notice or is made the subject of a further IRS audit. It may head off a potential stand off with the IRS over significant ACA penalty assessments.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
These Errors Greatly Determine Your Penalty Assessment in IRS Letter 226J
Article Name
These Errors Greatly Determine Your Penalty Assessment in IRS Letter 226J
Description
These errors impact your ACA penalty assessment from the IRS. Correcting them could help your organization avoid receiving an IRS Letter 226J in the future.
Author
JOANNA KIM-BRUNETTI
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/bzj
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

4980H Transition Relief BoxACA ComplianceAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersFederal Poverty LevelForm 1094-CHealth Insurance MarketplaceIRSLetter 226JMinimum Essential CoverageMinimum ValuePenaltiesPremium Tax CreditSafe HarborSection 4980H Transition Relief
Related Articles How Employers Can Turn Pay Data Reporting into a Better Business How Employers Can Turn Pay Data Reporting into a Better Business
Related Articles Gap Between ESG Efforts & Expectations Becoming More Apparent Gap Between ESG Efforts & Expectations Becoming More Apparent
Related Articles DEI Update: Nasdaq Seeks to Adopt Board Diversity Rule DEI Update: Nasdaq Seeks to Adopt Board Diversity Rule
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Feds Close “Skinny” Health Plan Loophole by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • California Individual Mandate Penalties Will be Issued in 2021
  • Biden’s Affordable Care Act Advancements are Underway
  • Five Resources Essential for ACA Compliance in 2021
  • Employers May Face Additional Challenges with 2020 ACA Reporting
  • What Employers Need to Know About the 2020 ACA 1095-C Codes
  • Most Frequently Asked ACA Questions for Employers and Individuals
  • Taxpayers (Including Employers) Have the Right to the Challenge IRS
  • Wage Fixing Indictment Has Implications for Employers

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!