The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • Prop 22 has Significant Implications on ACA Healthcare Benefits

Articles

Prop 22 has Significant Implications on ACA Healthcare Benefits

November 11, 2020 Joanna Kim-Brunetti Affordable Care Act
Prop 22 has Significant Implications on ACA Healthcare Benefits

2 minute read:

With everyone’s attention focused on the results of the presidential election, folks may not realize that California Prop 22 will pass. As of November 6, the status is 76% reporting with 58.4% of the vote, according to the Associated Press. Prop 22 has significant implications for gig economy drivers. Not least among these implications are healthcare benefits for app-based drivers. 

As we have previously written about gig economy workers, like those who work for Uber and Lyft, in California and other states, the issue of misclassification between employee and independent contractor looms large. California and New Jersey both recently adapted the ABC test for determining whether a worker can appropriately be classified as an independent contractor or if they must be classified as an employee, as well as stiff penalties for non-compliance. We discuss in detail the impacts of the ABC test on worker classification here. Essentially, the ABC test makes it impractical, if not impossible, for gig economy companies to continue to classify their workers as independent contractors while continuing to operate in the same manner.

With the apparently inevitable passage of Prop 22, a third category materializes for app-based drivers. In this separate third category, the app-based driver is not an employee nor a typical independent contractor. This has significant implications, not least of which includes the impact on the ACA Employer Mandate.

Under the ACA Employer Mandate, only full-time employees are required to be offered healthcare coverage. Of course, that requirement only applies to coverage for employees.  Specifically, as a reminder to employers in conjunction with the Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP), the ACA Employer Mandate, employers with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4980H penalties. The healthcare law defines full-time employees as workers who average 30 hours of work a week or 130 hours a month.  Failing to get this right can result in penalty assessments from the IRS.  

With Prop 22, app-based gig economy companies don’t have to offer health coverage to their drivers.  Instead, these gig economy companies must provide healthcare subsidies, which are “consistent with the average contributions required under the [ACA].” The structure of which workers get the subsidy is different from that under the Employer Mandate. Rather than a requirement to offer healthcare coverage for those who work at least on average 30 hours or more per week as required under the ACA, under Prop 22, the requirement to provide the subsidy depends on the average hours per quarter: (a) 100% of the average ACA contribution for applicable Covered California premiums for each month in a quarter for those who average at least 25 hours or more in a calendar quarter and (b) 50% for 15 to less than 25 hours.  Additionally, there are certain reporting requirements to be furnished to the app-based driver for each earnings period.

 

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
Prop 22 has Significant ACA Healthcare Benefits Implications
Article Name
Prop 22 has Significant ACA Healthcare Benefits Implications
Description
With the apparently inevitable passage of Prop 22, a third category materializes for app based drivers.
Author
Joanna Kim-Brunetti
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/lds
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA Penalty Risk AssessmentACA ReportingAffordable Care ActCongressCovered CaliforniaCOVID-19Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)FFCRA Frequently Asked QuestionsHealth Insurance ExchangeIRSMedicaidMedicaid.govMinimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Notice 2020-66Premium Tax Credit (PTC)
Related Articles Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland
Related Articles DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31 DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31
Related Articles Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
Essential ACA Guide for Employers 2020
Subscribe
Clean data owns future

Achieve Pay Equity

Popular Posts

  • New Individual Mandate Regulations: What You Need to Know
  • ACA Improvements to Expect from the Biden Administration
  • Employers, Mark These Key 2021 Dates for 2020 ACA Reporting
  • Don’t Forget The New 1095-C Codes Specific to The 2020 Tax Year
  • Minimize Penalties with ACA Best Practices for the Holiday Season
  • The ACA is Central to American Health and Wellbeing
  • PPP Loans Are Now Available, Both First Draw and Second Draw PPP Loans
  • Democrats Gain Senate, Paving the Way for Biden’s ACA Agenda

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!