The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

August 21, 2020 Joanna Kim-Brunetti ACA Compliance, Affordable Care Act
IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

4 minute read:

How exactly do employers prove to the IRS that the healthcare plans they are offering to their workforce are affordable under the Affordable Care Act?

It’s an important question for employers with 50 or more full-time and full-time equivalent employees that are considered by the IRS to be Applicable Large Employers or ALEs and that are required to comply with the ACA Employer Mandate. On an annual basis, ALEs are required to offer certain health coverage under Section 4980H of the Internal Revenue Code and file information returns to the IRS regarding such health coverage under Section 6056 of the Code.

Affordability of healthcare coverage offered by employers to its full-time employees is an important part of the formula to satisfy the ACA Employer Mandate that demonstrates ALEs have appropriately offered affordable health coverage. The IRS provides three affordability safe harbors that employers may claim when submitting their annual ACA information returns. The three safe harbors employers can use when proving ACA affordability to the IRS are the Rate of Pay, W-2, and Federal Poverty Line (FPL).

Rate of Pay Safe Harbor

The Rate of Pay Safe Harbor is a method for proving ACA affordability based on an employee’s hourly rate or monthly salaried rate or wages. Best practices suggest performing this safe harbor test for each full-time employee, every month.

Hourly Workers: To determine the affordability threshold for an hourly worker, for example, take the employee’s lowest hourly rate for the month and multiply by 130 (the minimum total of hours on a monthly basis to be treated as a full-time employee under the ACA). Take that product, multiply by 9.78% for 2020. This will identify the maximum monthly premium that the employee may be required to pay to satisfy affordability per ACA regulations.

Here’s an example: Alex works 130 hours at a $15 hourly rate in March.

Multiply $15 by 130. Take the result of $1,950 and multiply by 9.78%. The $190.71 is the maximum amount for March that Alex’s employer can require Alex to pay to cover himself if the employer wants to satisfy affordability for that month with respect to that employee.

Salaried Worker: To determine the affordability threshold for a salaried employee, multiply the monthly salary by 9.78%.

Here’s an example: Angela is a full-time employee who receives a monthly salary of $10,000. Multiply $10,000 by 9.78%. The $978 is the maximum monthly amount that Angela’s employer can require Angela to pay to cover herself if the employer wants to satisfy affordability for that month with respect to that employee.

W-2 Safe Harbor

The W-2 Safe Harbor is a method for proving ACA affordability that involves the use of an employee’s W-2 Box 1, gross income. It can be the trickiest safe harbor to use because it cannot be determined until the end of the year. The reason for this is because you need the amount in the W-2 Box 1 for the affordability calculation. In order to claim the W-2 Safe Harbor, the following formula is generally used: W-2 Box 1 Wages multiplied by 9.78% with an adjustment for partial year coverage.

Here’s an example: John is paid an annual salary of $42,000 per year. He was employed for only 9 out of the 12 months of the year and was offered coverage throughout those 9 months. Take $42,000 and multiply it by 9.78%. Multiply that result by 9/12. The product, $3,080.70, corresponds to the maximum annual amount that John’s employer can require John to pay for self-only coverage in order to meet the W-2 safe harbor for a total of 9 months. In other words, for each of those 9 months, John’s employer may not require him to pay more than $345.10 per month for self-only coverage.

FPL Safe Harbor

The Federal Poverty Line (FPL) Safe Harbor is a method for proving ACA affordability that is based on an employee’s annual household income, which is a function of that employee’s household size and is adjusted on an annual basis. For 2020, the mainland FPL is $12,760 for a household size of 1. In order to meet the FPL Safe Harbor, an employer must show that the full-time employees were offered self-only coverage that did not exceed the product of the FPL multiplied by 9.78% and then divided by 12 ($12,760 x 9.78% / 12 = $103.99). If the employee contribution for self-only coverage meets or is below this amount, then the FPL safe harbor is met.

Here’s an example: Sabrina is paid $2,000 a month, corresponding to $24,000 annually. Sabrina’s employer set up uniform contribution rates for self-only coverage at a required contribution rate at $60.00 a month. This monthly contribution is below the FPL ceiling of $103.99 per month and hence, the FPL Safe Harbor is met.

If an employer sponsored plan is offered to the full-time employee and his/her dependents and meets the FPL Safe Harbor (and Minimum Value) for self-only coverage, the offer would be a “Qualifying Offer,” which would then eliminate the need to code Line 15, which ordinarily requires a specific dollar amount of each monthly contribution.

Plan Nuances That May Affect Affordability

There are a number of considerations that can affect the affordability of a plan. Opt-out payments, wellness plans, flex credits, and health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) are some of the more common considerations that may either increase or decrease the affordability of an employer sponsored health plan. If your organization has components like these, you may want to seek an outside expert to help you make sure that the contributions identified on Line 15 of Form 1095-C are accurate.

Implementing safe harbors when administering your health plan is one thing. Communicating this information to the IRS is another. Notably, starting in 2020, the Form 1095-C included new codes for HRAs integrated with individual health insurance coverage or Medicare, subject to certain conditions.  Applying the correct code combinations is essential to preventing the issuance of Letter 226J to your organization, which the IRS is currently issuing for the 2018 tax year.

If your organization has received IRS Letter 226J, click here to learn best practices for responding to the penalty.

Implementing safe harbors when administering your health plan is one thing and communicating this information to the IRS is another. Minizmize risk, avoid penalties, and navigate the complexities of the ACA with full-service support from Trusaic.

Summary
IRS Safe Harbors for Affordability Help Avoid ACA Penalties
Article Name
IRS Safe Harbors for Affordability Help Avoid ACA Penalties
Description
Offering coverage to 95% of your full-time workforce is one piece of the puzzle. Avoiding penalties for failing to offer affordable coverage under IRS 4980H is another. Implementing safe harbor codes correctly can make your ACA compliance process.
Author
Joanna Kim-Brunetti
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/ert
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA ReportingAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersEmployer MandateFederal Poverty Line (FPL)Form 1095-CHealth Care CoverageInternal Revenue CodeIRSLetter 226JMinimum ValuePenaltiesRegulationsSafe HarborsSection 4980HSection 6056W-2 Safe Harbor
Related Articles DFEH No Longer Accepting Pay Data Reporting Extensions DFEH No Longer Accepting Pay Data Reporting Extensions
Related Articles HR.com Report Finds Employers Have Room to Improve on DEI Initiatives HR.com Report Finds Employers Have Room to Improve on DEI Initiatives
Related Articles FLSA Rule on Worker Classification to be Reversed FLSA Rule on Worker Classification to be Reversed
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Feds Close “Skinny” Health Plan Loophole by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
The ACA Is Complex
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • New Stimulus Plan Expands PTC Eligibility, Employer Penalties
  • ACA Affordability for the 2021 Tax Year
  • Recapping on Biden’s ACA Reforms, What Employers Need to Know
  • FTB to Publish Employer California Reporting Non-Compliance Data
  • March 31 is the Deadline for E-Filing ACA Returns With the IRS
  • Final Rule Allows for More Flexibility with Grandfathered Health Plans
  • Classify Workers Correctly to Determine ALE Status and Avoid ACA Penalties
  • What Happens if You Fail to Pay an ACA Penalty?

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (128)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!