The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • ACA Compliance Responsibilities Could Increase if the Federal Government Adopts the ABC Test for Employee Misclassification

Articles

ACA Compliance Responsibilities Could Increase if the Federal Government Adopts the ABC Test for Employee Misclassification

August 19, 2020 Maxfield Marquardt Affordable Care Act
ACA Compliance Responsibilities Could Increase if the Federal Government Adopts the ABC Test for Employee Misclassification

3 minute read:

A tsunami for the gig economy may be coming on the horizon. We have written recently about the ongoing issues that gig economy employers, such as Uber and Lyft, are facing in California and other states that are challenging them on their practice of classifying, or misclassifying, their workers as independent contractors. California and New Jersey both recently adopted the ABC test for determining whether a worker can appropriately be classified as an independent contractor or if they must be classified as an employee, and have established stiff penalties for non-compliance. We discuss in detail the impacts of the ABC test on worker classification here. Essentially, the ABC test makes it impractical, if not impossible, for gig economy companies to continue to classify their workers as independent contractors while continuing to operate in the same manner.

Gig companies are fighting back in California at least, trying to pass a measure called the App-Based Drivers Act this November and even threatening to shut down operations in California if the courts force them to classify their workers as employees.

The fighting between individual states and large gig employers could be muted come November based on a provision tucked into the PRO Act. Passed by the Democrat-controlled House in February, mostly along party lines, the PRO Act would adopt the ABC test on a national level. The PRO Act has not even been taken up by the Republican controlled Senate, but, especially amidst a growing sensitivity during the COVID-19 pandemic to the plight of gig workers who have fewer benefits to fall back on, should control of the Senate and presidency shift in November, there is a good chance that most, if not all, of the provisions in the PRO Act could be taken up again after the new year. Several prominent Democratic senators have voiced their support.

As previously discussed, one of the biggest impacts for employers forced to reclassify their workers as employees is the requirement for offering employee benefits to these new employees, including the requirements of providing healthcare coverage under the ACA.

As a reminder to employers in conjunction with the Employer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP), the ACA Employer Mandate, organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time-equivalent employees are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is affordable for the employee, or be subject to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4980H penalties. The healthcare law defines full-time employees as workers who average 30 hours of work a week or 130 hours a month.

Employers will need to incorporate these newly classified employees into their ACA compliance process. Employers will need to extend offers of health insurance coverage to more employees, and reporting requirements will grow in complexity. The volume of forms to be processed will increase, along with the costs associated with distributing 1095-C Forms to employees and submitting required ACA information to the IRS annually.

Failing to get this right can result in significant penalty assessments from the IRS. The agency is currently issuing ACA non-compliance penalty notices in Letter 226J for the 2017 tax year. Employers should seek out expert ACA compliance consultants to prepare for increased ACA compliance as more independent contractors become full-time employees under the ACA.

We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
ACA Compliance Responsibilities Could Increase if the Federal Government Adopts the ABC Test for Employee Misclassification
Article Name
ACA Compliance Responsibilities Could Increase if the Federal Government Adopts the ABC Test for Employee Misclassification
Description
Gig economy employers may face increased ACA compliance responsibilities if the ABC test for employee misclassification is adopted.
Author
Maxfield Marquardt
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/jok
Maxfield Marquardt

Maxfield Marquardt

Counsel/Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs

View more by Maxfield Marquardt

Related tags to article

1095-C FormABC TestACA ComplianceACA Employer MandateAffordable Care ActApp-Based Drivers ActCOVID-19Covid-19 PandemicDemocratEmployee ClassificationEmployee MisclassificationGig EconomyHealth Care CoverageIndependent ContractorsInternal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4980H PenaltiesIRSIRS Letter 226JLyftMinimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)PRO ActRepublicanSenateUber
Related Articles Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality Roe v. Wade Decision Signals Loss of Equality
Related Articles California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature California SB 1162 Continues Through State Legislature
Related Articles 4 Steps For Helping Your Organization Celebrate Juneteenth 4 Steps For Helping Your Organization Celebrate Juneteenth
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • What Employers Need to Know About the California Individual Mandate
  • Get to Know the ACA’s Rule of Parity
  • What you Need to Know About IRS Letter 5699
  • Handling Seasonal Employees and Workers is Critical for ACA Compliance
  • The 2022 ACA 101 Toolkit is Here

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (168)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (86)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!