The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • Affordable Care Act
  • ACA Employer Mandate Poses IRS and US GAAP Complications

Articles

ACA Employer Mandate Poses IRS and US GAAP Complications

February 26, 2018 Joanna Kim-Brunetti Affordable Care Act, IRS
ACA Employer Mandate Poses IRS and US GAAP Complications

You would think it would go without saying, but let’s say it. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and its employer mandate have tax and financial implications.

And that means it’s as much a problem for Chief Financial Officers and their CPAs as the HR folks who typically are tasked with ensuring organizations comply with the ACA.

Organizations with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees must comply with the ACA’s employer mandate. The employer mandate requires these called Applicable Large Employers (ALE’s) to either offer minimum essential coverage to their full-time employees and their dependents and make the coverage “affordable” and provide “minimum value” to the full-time employees, or potentially make an employer shared responsibility payment (ESRP) to the IRS. Employees who work a minimum of 30 hours per week are considered to be “full time” under the ACA.

Annual reporting of healthcare benefits offered by ALE’s must be furnished to full-time employees and be reported to the IRS using Form 1095-C.

Failure to offer ACA-mandated healthcare benefits to at least 95% of all full-time employees and their dependents may result in significant ESRP assessments. Many organizations are now facing notices that propose ESRP’s in the millions of dollars, penalties assessed by the IRS for their failing to comply with the ACA. These IRS notices, Letter 226J, have been issued to organizations that the IRS asserts failed to comply with the ACA in their information filings to the IRS for the 2015 tax year. (To learn how to respond to Letter 226J, click here.)

As a result, CFOs at ALEs should be taking into consideration the requirements of US GAAP – ASC 450 Contingencies (formerly FAS 5). If ESRPs are a possibility, probable and reasonably estimable loss contingencies, they should be recognized and disclosed in financial statements. If not, ALEs must demonstrate that they have internal controls in place to mitigate any such potential excise tax liability.

If ERSPs are imposed, these IRS penalties may need to be disclosed in the MD&A section in SEC filings. Employer Mandate penalties must be disclosed on a partnership’s Schedule M-1.

These ESRP penalties may result in effective tax rate increase and are not tax deductible.

Here are some steps you can take to help prepare for possible implications on your organization’s financial statements.

• Corporate Organization: Analyze corporate structure to determine which entities are part of a control group in determining ALE status.

• Data Consolidation and Systems Controls: Examine systems and data consolidation process to identify any gaps that may impact ability to generate accurate IRS 6055/6056 reporting.

• Workforce Analytics: Provide comprehensive analysis of potentially healthcare eligible employees (i.e., part-time, seasonal, independent contractors, etc.) and company readiness and capability to measure variable hour workers. This should be done on a monthly basis.

• Benefits Offering Analysis: Verify minimum value of offered healthcare plans. According to Healthcare.gov, A health plan meets the minimum value standard if its designed to pay at least 60% of the total cost of medical services for a standard population and its benefits include substantial coverage of physician and inpatient hospital services.

• Affordability Analysis: Determine affordability that accounts for HRAs, opt-out arrangements, flex credits and other programs that impact affordability of healthcare offerings as determined by the ACA. Employer Mandate guidelines state that coverage is affordable when an employee has to pay no more than 9.5% of their household income (9.56% for 2018 as annually adjusted.)

• IRC Sections 6055 and 6056 Reporting: Assess current processes and systems to be used to timely prepare, distribute and file ACA information returns.

• Potential Excise Tax Liabilities: Estimate Section 4980H(a) and (b) excise tax liabilities. Penalties for Section 4980H include two types of ESRPs for ALEs. The “A” penalty for 2017 is $2,260, multiplied by the total number of full-time employees. The “B” penalty applied to ALEs who for the 2017 tax year is $3,390, multiplied by the number of full time employees who receives a tax subsidy for purchasing coverage through the government healthcare marketplace.

• Implement Healthcare Marketplace Exchange appeal processes to refute any notices that claim your organization is not in compliance with ACA requirements.

• Employee Notifications: Assess and implement communication and documentation controls for ACA-related employee notifications that you may receive from the Healthcare Marketplace or the IRS.

Keeping in mind that the ACA employer mandate has both financial and tax implications to prevent your organization from having issues with auditors and help you plan ahead so that any ESRPs will not have an adverse impact on your organization’s operations and financial statements.

If it’s a bit daunting, consider seeking assistance from a third-party vendor expert in both regulatory compliance and tax regulations. And ask if that vendor will stand with your organization if it receives an ESRP in a Letter 226J or is audited by the IRS. It may be worth the cost for the peace of mind it will provide.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
ACA Employer Mandate Poses IRS and US GAAP Complications
Article Name
ACA Employer Mandate Poses IRS and US GAAP Complications
Description
The IRS has begun enforcing the Affordable Care Act and the potential penalties can have serious tax and financial implications for organizations and their financial statements.
Author
JOANNA KIM-BRUNETTI
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/cdc
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersEmployer MandateEmployer Shared Responsibility Payment (ESRP)Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)Healthcare Marketplace ExchangeHealthcare.govHRAsIRC Sections 6055 and 6056 ReportingIRSIRS 6055/6056 ReportingIRS Section 4980H(b)Letter 226JMD&A SectionMinimum Essential CoverageMinimum ValuePenaltiesRegulationsRegulatory ComplianceSchedule M-1Section 4980H(a)US GAAP – ASC 450 Contingencies (FAS 5)
Related Articles Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland
Related Articles DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31 DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31
Related Articles Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HealthCare.gov Readied For Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Feds Close “Skinny” Health Plan Loophole by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe
Clean data owns future

Achieve Pay Equity

Popular Posts

  • New Individual Mandate Regulations: What You Need to Know
  • ACA Improvements to Expect from the Biden Administration
  • Employers, Mark These Key 2021 Dates for 2020 ACA Reporting
  • Don’t Forget The New 1095-C Codes Specific to The 2020 Tax Year
  • Minimize Penalties with ACA Best Practices for the Holiday Season
  • The ACA is Central to American Health and Wellbeing
  • PPP Loans Are Now Available, Both First Draw and Second Draw PPP Loans
  • Democrats Gain Senate, Paving the Way for Biden’s ACA Agenda

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!