The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Notice
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • California Carries the Torch for State-Based Individual Mandates

Articles

California Carries the Torch for State-Based Individual Mandates

January 16, 2019 Robert Sheen ACA Compliance, Health Care Coverage
California Carries the Torch for State-Based Individual Mandates

2 minute read:

California Governor Gavin Newsom has not wasted time wading into the healthcare debate.

The governor has proposed an individual mandate requiring all California residents to obtain health coverage or face a penalty, and having California become the first state in the nation to offer subsidies to individuals and families with income between 400% and 600% of the federal poverty level. Currently, only individuals and families with income between 100% and 400% are eligible for government subsidies for purchasing health insurance through Healthcare.gov or a state-exchange.

Other proposals include creating the largest-scale single-purchaser system for prescription drugs and the expansion for Medi-Cal to cover undocumented young adults.

California’s push for a statewide individual mandate may be further proof that 2019 could be the year for more state-based individual mandates. Currently, Massachusetts and New Jersey have state individual mandates in place. Vermont will institute an individual mandate in 2020.

These actions at the state level have been prompted by Congress’s decision, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, to lower the tax penalty to $0 for any American that does not purchase health insurance as required by the ACA’s Individual Mandate. The $0 penalty goes into effect this year. The Individual Mandate penalty is still in force for the 2018 tax year.

Recently, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, made a controversial ruling that because the Individual Mandate was zeroed out, it had the effect of rendering the ACA unconstitutional. The ACA remains in effect while the court ruling is being appealed.

Expect more states to consider pursuing state-based individual mandates to help pay for their healthcare programs unless Congress moves to restore the penalty for the ACA’s Individual Mandate.

As more states pass their own individual mandates, expect healthcare regulations to become more complicated and fragmented, adding new layers of complexity to what employers face in addressing compliance with the federal ACA.

Under the ACA’s Employer Mandate, Applicable Large Employers (ALEs), organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to IRS 4980H penalties.

If you are an ALE and have not yet filed ACA information with the IRS for previous tax years, be aware that the IRS has started to issue a new round of ACA penalties that focus on failure to distribute 1095-C forms to employees and to file 1094-C and 1095-C forms with the federal tax agency by required deadlines. These are penalties in addition to the 4980H penalties for not offering the required healthcare coverage.

With half the businesses in the U.S. saying they are not confident in their ability to satisfy ACA requirements and reported 4980H penalties in the tens of millions of dollars, the stakes are high. Now is the time to get real about your organization’s obligation to comply with the ACA.

If you are a company that should be filing ACA-related information with the IRS and have not complied, you should immediately seek assistance to submit filings for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 tax years to mitigate your potential financial exposure.

Organizations lacking confidence in their ACA process should consider undertaking an ACA Penalty Risk Assessment. Many outside experts who specialize in ACA services offer these assessments at no-cost.

We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
California Carries the Torch for State-Based Individual Mandates
Article Name
California Carries the Torch for State-Based Individual Mandates
Description
California’s proposal for a individual mandate may provide encouragement to more states to adopt their own.
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/nwa
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen, Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic, Inc. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

1094-C1095-CACA ComplianceACA Penalty Risk AssessmentAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersCaliforniaCongressFederal Poverty Level (FPL)Gavin NewsomHealth Care CoverageHealthcare.govIndividual MandatesIRSIRS 4980H PenaltiesMedi-CalMinimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)PenaltiesRegulationsTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
Related Articles New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November New York Pay Transparency Law Delayed to November
Related Articles Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results Takeaways From the 2021 UK Gender Pay Gap Reporting Results
Related Articles LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits LinkedIn Settlement Demonstrates Need For Accurate Pay Equity Audits
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HealthCare.gov Readied For Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
ACA Essential Guide for Employers 2021
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • IRS Proposed Ruling Could Change ACA Affordability
  • ACA Penalty Letter 226J on The Rise
  • Submit ACA Corrections Now to Avoid IRS Penalties
  • New PTC Data is Cause For Concern For Employers
  • ACA Enrollment Reaches 35 Million Signups

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (167)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (87)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: What triggers an ACA penalty

Trusaic News

Our Story


FEATURED IN

Human Resources Today
Connected Health Pulse

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!