The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • Expect Greater Scrutiny and Audits from IRS Staff on ACA Compliance

Articles

Expect Greater Scrutiny and Audits from IRS Staff on ACA Compliance

June 24, 2019 Robert Sheen ACA Compliance, Affordable Care Act
Expect Greater Scrutiny and Audits from IRS Staff on ACA Compliance

4 minute read:

The IRS staff is preparing a new round of IRC 4980H penalty assessments to be issued to employers for failing to comply with the requirements of the Affordable Care Act.

The agency is in the process of issuing new Letters 226J for the 2017 tax year. Letter 226J is the penalty notice issued by the IRS to those employers the tax agency believes have failed to comply with the ACA’s Employer Mandate. This mandate requires all employers with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to IRS 4980H penalties. These employers are considered to be Applicable Large Employers, or ALEs.

Employers who received these Letter 226J penalty assessments for the 2015 and 2016 tax years found an IRS staff that was receptive to reasonable arguments as to why the ACA non-compliance occurred. In some instances, staff let penalty assessments slide if the ACA compliance failure was based on a paperwork error, such as failing to check a box. Some compliance issues were dismissed because of misunderstandings of safe harbor provisions or other basic provisions of the law.

That is going to change.

Going forward, expect IRS staff to begin scrutinizing the methodology and data underlying employers’ determination of full-time employees in ACA filings for the 2017 tax year, which is a deeper level of review than may have been undertaken for previous tax years. This will mean a deeper examination by IRS staff as they audit full-time and part-time employee counts provided by employers in their annual ACA submissions. IRS staff also is expected to request companies provide the support information to explain how they derived these full-time employee counts to prove their accuracy. Inaccurately providing full-time employee counts has been a trigger for ACA penalties.

Over the past few years, employers using do-it-yourself software and payroll companies have relied on them to submit accurate information to the IRS by identified deadlines. In some cases, the software and payroll companies thought they submitted the information electronically to the IRS, not realizing the submissions were never accepted. They never confirmed whether they received the submission acceptance notices to prove that the ACA information returns had been received by the IRS. Now, many employers are realizing that the IRS never received their submissions and, as a result, are being issued ACA penalty notices. Expect IRS staff to insist that employers obtain submission acceptance notices to prove they filed with the IRS as they mount a defense to have ACA penalty notices dismissed.

The IRS also is cracking down on individuals who have received Premium Tax Credits (PTCs) to offset health insurance purchased through government exchanges. The IRS is asking individual taxpayers to obtain documents from their employers to prove that they are entitled to their PTCs, placing additional paperwork burdens on HR teams.

In addition to Letter 226J, the IRS is expected to become more aggressive in issuing penalty assessments associated with IRC 6721/6722. These penalty assessments are issued using Letter 5005-A with Form 866-A. They are sent to ALEs that failed to furnish 1095-C forms to employees under IRC 6721/6722 or file forms 1094-C and 1095-C with the IRS for the 2017 tax year. These notices focus on the failure of ALEs to distribute 1095-C forms to employees and to file 1094-C and 1095-C forms with the federal tax agency by required deadlines. IRS staff believes that many employers have not made ACA filings for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 tax years.

The IRS is issuing a preliminary Letter 5699 to those ALEs the IRS believes should have been filing ACA information annually with the tax agency. In this notice, the IRS asks employers to confirm the name the ALE used when filing its ACA information, provide the Employer Identification Number (EIN) submitted, and the date the filing was made. It appears that the agency is determining if penalty assessments are warranted for certain employers by cross referencing the number of W-2s employers filed with the IRS with their 1094-C and 1095-C forms. If this information is not consistent, it will lead to the IRS issuing the ALE a penalty notice. Replying to Letter 5699 is crucial if you have already filed information with the IRS because the information your organization provided should have prevented your organization from receiving an ACA penalty notice. Failure to respond will result in the Letter 5005-A with Form 866-A.

With so much at stake, employers should consider undertaking an ACA Penalty Risk Assessment to learn if they will be deemed ALEs and are at risk of receiving ACA penalties from the IRS. Some outside experts may offer to undertake this assessment at no cost to employers. Such a review can reap dividends by helping organizations avoid significant IRS ACA penalties.

It’s also a good time to review your organization’s ACA paperwork to ensure it is organized and readily available in case you receive an ACA penalty notice. This is more important than ever with the IRS limiting the amount of time organizations have to respond to penalty notices. For instance, employers that receive IRS Letter 226J penalty notice for failing to comply with the ACA will be limited to one 30-day extension for each IRS notice received in the penalty process. That means employers need to act with even more urgency as the window for responding to the penalty assessment will be shorter due to this new enforcement policy.

If you are an employer that should be filing ACA-related information with the IRS and have not complied, you should immediately seek assistance to submit filings for the 2015, 2016 and 2017 tax years to mitigate your organization’s potential financial exposure.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
Expect Greater Scrutiny and Audits from IRS Staff on ACA Compliance
Article Name
Expect Greater Scrutiny and Audits from IRS Staff on ACA Compliance
Description
IRS staff has sent signals that it will be providing greater scrutiny of methodology
Author
Robert Sheen
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/yto
Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen

Robert Sheen, Esq., is editor-in-chief of The ACA Times. He also is founder, president and CEO of Trusaic.

Robert Sheen is Founder and President of Trusaic, Inc. Robert is a graduate of the University of Southern California, in Business Administration with an emphasis in International Finance. He earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, concentrating in Tax Law.

View more by Robert Sheen

Related tags to article

1094-C1095-CACA ComplianceACA Employer MandateACA PenaltiesACA Penalty Risk AssessmentACA ReportingAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersEmployer Identification Number (EIN)Form 866-AIRC 6721/6722IRSIRS 4980H PenaltiesIRS Letter 226JLetter 5005-ALetter 5699Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC)Minimum Value (MV)Premium Tax Credits (PTCs)Safe Harbor
Related Articles How to Leverage Your Workforce Data to Meet DEI Goals How to Leverage Your Workforce Data to Meet DEI Goals
Related Articles An Employer’s Guide to Navigating the DEI&A Landscape An Employer’s Guide to Navigating the DEI&A Landscape
Related Articles Governments, Investors, & Litigators Are Focusing More on ESG Governments, Investors, & Litigators Are Focusing More on ESG
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles HHS Awards $36 Million To Health Centers by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe

Popular Posts

  • California Individual Mandate Penalties Will be Issued in 2021
  • Biden’s Affordable Care Act Advancements are Underway
  • What Employers Need to Know About the 2020 ACA 1095-C Codes
  • Employers May Face Additional Challenges with 2020 ACA Reporting
  • Five Resources Essential for ACA Compliance in 2021
  • The IRS is Issuing ACA Penalty Letter 226J for 2018
  • Most Frequently Asked ACA Questions for Employers and Individuals
  • Taxpayers (Including Employers) Have the Right to the Challenge IRS

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!