The ACA Times


  Show menu
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Get to Know the ACA
  • ACA – Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Meet the Editors
  • Trusaic
  • Contact Us
  • Legal
  
  • Home
  • ACA Compliance
  • IRS Limited Non-Assessment Periods May Help Avoid ACA Penalties [UPDATE]

Articles

IRS Limited Non-Assessment Periods May Help Avoid ACA Penalties [UPDATE]

February 11, 2019 Joanna Kim-Brunetti ACA Compliance, Affordable Care Act
IRS Limited Non-Assessment Periods May Help Avoid ACA Penalties [UPDATE]

4 minute read:

The Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions (ESRP) under the Affordable Care Act may seem straightforward, but, in reality, complying with them can be challenging and time consuming.

An area that many Applicable Large Employers (ALEs) struggle with is knowing when they are required to extend an offer of coverage to their full-time employees. As an ALE, the IRS allows for certain grace periods, referred by the IRS as Limited Non-Assessment Periods, in which certain circumstances are allowed as reasons for not extending an offer of coverage immediately to a full-time employee.

A Limited Non-Assessment Period, according to the IRS, “generally refers to a period during which an ALE Member will not be subject to an assessable payment under section 4980H(a), and in certain cases section 4980H(b), for a full-time employee, regardless of whether that employee is offered health coverage during that period.”

So, it’s important to understand Limited Non-Assessment Periods. It could help your organization avoid being penalized by the IRS.

There are 6 different scenarios for claiming a Limited Non-Assessment Period.

1. First Year as ALE Period. January through March of the first calendar year in which an employer is an ALE, but only for an employee who was not offered health coverage by the employer at any point during the prior calendar year. This rule applies only during the first year that an employer is an ALE. It does not apply if, for example, the employer falls below the 50 full-time employee threshold for a subsequent calendar year and then increases employment and becomes an ALE again.

2. Waiting Period under the Monthly Measurement Method. If an ALE Member is using the monthly measurement method to determine whether an employee is a full-time employee, the period beginning with the first full calendar month in which the employee is first otherwise (but for completion of the waiting period) eligible for an offer of health coverage and ending no later than two full calendar months after the end of that first calendar month.

3. Waiting Period under the Look-Back Measurement Method. If an ALE Member is using the look-back measurement method to determine whether an employee is a full-time employee and the employee is reasonably expected to be a full-time employee at his or her start date, the period beginning on the employee’s start date and ending not later than the end of the employee’s third full calendar month of employment.

4. Initial Measurement Period and Associated Administrative Period under the Look-Back Measurement Method. If an ALE Member is using the look-back measurement method to determine whether a new employee is a full-time employee, and the employee is a variable hour employee, seasonal employee or part-time employee, the initial measurement period for that employee and the administrative period immediately following the end of that initial measurement period.

5. Period Following Change in Status that Occurs During Initial Measurement Period Under the Look-Back Measurement Method. If an ALE Member is using the look-back measurement method to determine whether a new employee is a full-time employee, and, as of the employee’s start date, the employee is a variable hour employee, seasonal employee or part-time employee, but, during the initial measurement period, the employee has a change in employment status such that, if the employee had begun employment in the new position or status, the employee would have reasonably been expected to be a full-time employee, the period beginning on the date of the employee’s change in employment status and ending not later than the end of the third full calendar month following the change in employment status. If the employee is a full-time employee based on the initial measurement period and the associated stability period starts sooner than the end of the third full calendar month following the change in employment status, this Limited Non-Assessment Period ends on the day before the first day of that associated stability period.

6. First Calendar Month of Employment. If the employee’s first day of employment is a day other than the first day of the calendar month, then the employee’s first calendar month of employment is a Limited Non-Assessment Period.

Want more information? You can find more on the requirements of Limited Non-Assessment Periods in the Federal Register, Volume 79, No. 29 (Feb. 12, 2014).

Limited Non-Assessment Periods are indicated on Line 16 of the 1095-C so it’s important to make sure you are claiming them correctly. Failing to do so could result in 4980H penalties presented in IRS Letter 226J.

As a reminder, under the ACA’s Employer Mandate, ALEs, organizations with 50 or more full-time employees and full-time equivalent employees, are required to offer Minimum Essential Coverage (MEC) to at least 95% of their full-time workforce (and their dependents) whereby such coverage meets Minimum Value (MV) and is Affordable for the employee or be subject to IRS 4980H penalties.

Employers should also note that the IRS is now issuing penalties for failing to distribute 1095-C schedules to full-time employees and to file 1094-C and 1095-C schedules with the federal tax agency by required deadlines under IRC Section 6721 and 6722. Importantly, the IRS is calculating the penalties based on the W-2 count, which will typically be much higher than the full-time employee count.

Employers might want to consider undertaking a free ACA Penalty Risk Assessment of their IRS information filings for 2015, 2016 and 2017 to ensure that the Limited Non-Assessment Periods are correctly and accurately coded on the 1095-C schedules. Many outside vendors will provide this service at no cost. It might just prevent you from receiving a penalty notice from the IRS.

To learn more about ACA compliance in 2021, click here.


We’re committed to helping companies reduce risk, avoid penalties, and achieve 100% ACA compliance. For questions about the ACA contact us here.

Summary
IRS Limited Non-Assessment Periods May Help Avoid ACA Penalties
Article Name
IRS Limited Non-Assessment Periods May Help Avoid ACA Penalties
Description
Understanding when you need to extend offers of coverage to your full-time workforce is one of the most challenging elements of the ACA.
Author
JOANNA KIM-BRUNETTI
Publisher Name
The ACA Times
Publisher Logo
The ACA Times
Short URL of this page: https://acatimes.com/ewd
Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Joanna Kim-Brunetti, Esq., is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Trusaic.

View more by Joanna Kim-Brunetti

Related tags to article

ACA ComplianceACA Spot AuditAffordable Care ActApplicable Large EmployersAssociated Administrative PeriodEmployer MandateEmployer Shared Responsibility Provisions (ESRP)Health Care CoverageInitial Measurement PeriodIRSIRS 4980H PenaltiesIRS Letter 226JLook-Back Measurement MethodMinimum Essential CoverageMinimum ValueMonthly Measurement MethodNon-Assessment PeriodsPenalties
Related Articles Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland Three Essential Pay Equity Practices, According to Iceland
Related Articles DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31 DFEH Adds New Guidance for SB 973 Reporting Due on March 31
Related Articles Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law Georgia Results May Have Impact on Federal Pay Equity Law
Related Articles Administration Predicts Lower ACA Enrollment by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles Feds Close “Skinny” Health Plan Loophole by Robert Sheen  •  
Related Articles IRS Eases Rules on Hardship Exemptions by Robert Sheen  •  
Subscribe
Clean data owns future

Achieve Pay Equity

Popular Posts

  • New Individual Mandate Regulations: What You Need to Know
  • ACA Improvements to Expect from the Biden Administration
  • Employers, Mark These Key 2021 Dates for 2020 ACA Reporting
  • Don’t Forget The New 1095-C Codes Specific to The 2020 Tax Year
  • Minimize Penalties with ACA Best Practices for the Holiday Season
  • The ACA is Central to American Health and Wellbeing
  • PPP Loans Are Now Available, Both First Draw and Second Draw PPP Loans
  • Democrats Gain Senate, Paving the Way for Biden’s ACA Agenda

Trending Topics

  • Regulations
    (91)
  • Legislation
    (47)
  • Editorials
    (19)
  • ACA Compliance
    (126)
  • Tax Filings
    (19)
  • Applicable Large Employer (ALE)
    (13)
  • Penalties
    (18)
  • IRS
    (82)
  • Health Insurance Marketplace
    (28)
  • Polls/Surveys
    (18)
  • Health Care Reform
    (22)
  • Reporting
    (22)
  • IRS 226J/226-J
    (28)

Categories


Brought to you by Trusaic

 

 

 

Twitter Facebook

Downloads

The ACA 101 Toolkit

The Essential Guide to the ACA

Letter 226J Infographic

5 Common ACA Compliance Mistakes

Triangle of Trust

Articles

IRS Affordability Safe Harbors Help Avoid ACA Penalties

Calculating FT and FTE Employees

The ACA Monthly Measurement Method: A Few Examples

The IRS’s 1095 Forms for ACA Explained

Incorrect ITINs Will Cause Havoc With ACA Compliance

Knowledge Center

Get to know the ACA

Get to know Letter 226J

Webinar: The Recipe for Successful ACA Compliance

Trusaic News

Our Story

© 2021 Copyright Trusaic - All Rights reserved.

Close Window

Loading, Please Wait!

This may take a second or two. Loading, Please Wait!